Aurelian Paladin's Greatsword
| Aurelian Paladin's Greatsword | |||||||||||||||
| Aurelian Paladin greatsword · Paladin's enchanted greatsword · the radiant greatsword · Paladin sword | |||||||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||||||
| Item | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
The Aurelian Paladin’s Greatsword is the weapon of the Aurelian Paladin who led the session 10 ambush in Umbrafall; the DM said it “deals extra radiant damage” [8]. The radiant burned Mharos, the demon in Vasquez, and put Vasquez down twice [9][10]. Hugo took the sword from the body, The Broker would not take it, and it went to Vasquez to experiment on for a better gunblade [2][12][5]. It has not been mentioned since.
Overview
The Aurelian Paladin’s Greatsword is the blade the unnamed Aurelian Paladin swung in the Umbrafall alley fight of session 10. The DM said the man was “just blessed by Aurelia” and that “the sword deals extra radiant damage” [8]. The radiant burned the demon Mharos inside Vasquez [9][10]. After Ruin killed the Paladin, Hugo took the sword [11][2], the Broker declined it [12], and the party agreed it should go to Vasquez to experiment on [5].
Description
The DM never described the blade beyond the glowing slash it left in the air when it struck [9]. It was found on the Paladin’s body with a heavy crossbow and his coin [3].
Mechanics (as played)
- Radiant rider. Each hit added radiant damage to the slashing: 4 and 4 on the first two hits on Vasquez, 7 on a later one, 7 on a hit on Hugo, and 2 on a riposte at Hugo [13][10][14][15].
- Mharos. The radiant “burned” the demon in Vasquez: “you feel Mharos burn” [9], and later “burning the demon within you” [10].
- Identification. None is shown. Hugo asked what kind of greatsword it was [16], and his Arcana check of 4 on the sword and armour got “Yeah, no idea.” [17].
Open questions
- Where does the radiant come from? The DM first said the sword deals it [8], but Hugo’s check, made to learn whether it came from the armour, the sword or the man, settled nothing [17].
- Did Vasquez ever work on it? He said he might be able to “fashion a better gunblade” from it [18]. No crafting is shown, and the sword is not mentioned again.
History in the campaign
Session 10: Ruin Joins, the Aurelian Conspiracy, the Plate Armour
Main article: Session 10
The Paladin led an ambush a couple of blocks from the Broker’s office [19]. His first two swings at Vasquez each added 4 radiant, and the DM said Vasquez felt Mharos burn [13]. The sword downed Vasquez again and cut Hugo for 14 slashing and 7 radiant [20] before Ruin’s Eldritch Blast killed the Paladin [11]. Hugo took the sword and dragged the body to the Broker [2][21]. The Broker offered to take the armour, but when the sword came up he said “No, sadly not.” [22][23]. On the way back to the tavern the party agreed the sword and plate would go to Vasquez to experiment on [5].
Session 17: New Hands, the Black Mask’s Renegotiation, and the Rimeclaw
Main article: Session 17
The sword is not mentioned. The retcon that opens the session takes Vasquez and Althea out of the party, and the DM later says the Aurelians captured them [6][7]. The sword is presumed to have gone with Vasquez. Under ruling 25 he is a departed player character, not an open rescue thread.
Status
As of session 17. Presumed with Vasquez, who left play in the retcon; its whereabouts are not stated [7].
See also
- Vasquez
- Aurelian Paladin (s10)
- Aurelian Plate Armour with Nullstone Runes
- Vasquez’s Gunblade
- Mharos
- The Broker
References
- ^ Session 10, line 821-836: The Paladin's greatsword burns Mharos in Vasquez; the DM says the sword deals extra radiant damage.
- ^ Session 10, line 1058: Hugo takes the sword and drags the body towards the Broker.
- ^ Session 10, line 1111: The Paladin's loot, a greatsword, a heavy crossbow and coin.
- ^ Session 10, line 1328-1332: The Broker will not take the sword, and recognises the armour as enchanted.
- ^ Session 10, line 1418-1430: Vasquez wants the sword to try for a better gunblade; the sword and plate go to him.
- ^ Session 17, line 130: The retcon that leaves Vasquez and Althea behind.
- ^ Session 17, line 785: The DM restates it; they were captured by the Aurelians.
- ^ Session 10, line 836: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 827: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 931: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 1054: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 1328-1330: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 825-827: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 935: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 1008: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 1115: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 1118-1123: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 1418: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 1059: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 928-935: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 1134: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 1317: Inline citation.
- ^ Session 10, line 1330: Inline citation.
